[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: copyright fraud? Works of the U.S. Government
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: copyright fraud? Works of the U.S. Government
- From: "Klein, Bonnie CIV DTIC B" <BKlein@dtic.mil>
- Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 20:43:24 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Title 17 USC Sec 105 declares that Works of the U.S. Government, defined in Title 17 USC Sec 101 as prepared by Government employees or officers on the job, are not copyright protected in the U.S. Foreign copyrights may apply in Berne Convention signatory countries that copyright government works such as the UK, Canada, Australia, etc. This clearly sets U.S. Government works apart from the common misperception that equates them to works in the public domain. LIMITATIONS OTHER THAN COPYRIGHT ON THE USE OF USG WORKS Although, United States Government (USG) works prepared by officers and employees of the U.S. Government as part of their official duties (17 U.S.C. 101) are not protected by copyright in the U.S. (17 USC Sec. 105 ), there may be other intellectual property and legal limitations governing the terms and conditions of their use. COPYRIGHT CAVEATS Privately-created, copyrighted works (e.g. quote, photograph, chart, drawing, etc.) incorporated into USG works under license or with permission of the copyright owner retain their copyright. Similarly, contractors and grantees are not considered Government employees; generally they hold copyright to works they produce for the Government. The Government is granted a worldwide license to use, modify, reproduce, release, perform, display or disclose these works by or on behalf of the Government; the USG license is not always transferrable to the general public. Uses, transmission or reproduction of these protected items beyond that allowed by fair use http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl102.html or other limitations on exclusive rights (secs. 102-122 http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html )may require permission of the copyright owners. Also note that the 17 USC Sec 105 allows the USG to acquire and retain copyrights transferred to it. See "Copyright Alert: Even U.S. Government Information May be Protected by Copyright" http://www.infotoday.com/searcher/apr09/Klein.shtml published in Searcher, April 2009 issue. OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS PRIVACY AND PUBLICITY RIGHTS Privacy and publicity rights are separate and distinct interests from copyrights. Copyright protects the copyright holder's property rights in the work. Privacy and publicity rights protect the interests of the person(s) who may be the subject(s) of the work. Privacy and publicity rights are the subject of state laws which vary in what is permitted. Also note that related causes of action may be pursued under the federal Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. Sec. 1125 (a), for example, for unauthorized uses of a person's identity in order to create a false endorsement. If a recognizable person appears in a photograph or video recording, or the talent (such as a performance or narration) of a known individual is included in an audio or video recording, use for commercial purposes may infringe on a right of privacy or publicity. Permission should be obtained from the recognizable person or known individual or the estate of the known individual, if deceased. However, if the intended use is primarily for educational or informational purposes, e.g., books, newspapers, and magazines reporting facts of historical significance, then such uses will generally not be considered an infringement of personal rights. OFFICIAL USG SEALS, EMBLEMS, INSIGNIA, NAMES AND TRADEMARKS 18 United States Code, Sec.709, prohibits the intentional unauthorized use of USG emblems, insignia, names and trademarks to create a misleading impression of affiliation or endorsement by the Federal Government. A trademark is a word, phrase, symbol or design, or a combination of words, phrases, symbols or designs, that identifies and distinguishes the source of the goods of one party from those of others. A service mark is the same as a trademark, except that it identifies and distinguishes the source of a service rather than a product. See "Use of Government Personnel Uniform and Insignia in Promotional or Advertising Materials" by L. Victorino and K. Szeliga at http://www.governmentcontractslawblog.com/2009/05/articles/intellectual-... DISCLAIMER OF ENDORSEMENT Neither the U.S. Government nor its employees endorse or recommend any commercial products, processes, or services. Reference to or appearance of any specific commercial products, processes, or services by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the U.S. Government. The views and opinions of authors expressed on USG web sites or in materials available through download from agencies do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S. Government and they may not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY With respect to materials (e.g., documents, photographs, audio recordings, video recordings, tools, data products, or services) neither the U.S. Government nor any of its employees or contractors make any representations or warranties, express, implied, or statutory, as to the validity, accuracy, completeness, or fitness for a particular purpose; nor represent that use would not infringe privately owned rights; nor assume any liability resulting from the use of such materials and shall in no way be liable for any costs, expenses, claims, or demands arising out of the use of such materials. IN SUMMARY * USG does not grant exclusive use rights with respect to USG material * USG should be acknowledged as the source of its material. Title 17 USC Sec 403 * It is unlawful to falsely claim copyright or other rights in USG material. Title 17 USC Sec 504 * USG material may not be used to state or imply the endorsement by USG or by any USG employee of a commercial products, processes, or services, or used in any other manner that might mislead. * Use of USG identifiers which would express or imply such an endorsement is strictly prohibited. * Use of the USG agency name or initials as an identifying symbol by organizations other than the agency is strictly prohibited. * USG does not indemnify nor hold harmless users of USG material, nor release such users from copyright infringement. * USG personnel are not authorized to sign indemnity or hold harmless statements, releases from copyright infringement, or documents granting exclusive use rights. Bonnie Klein Co-Chair, CENDI Copyright Working Group www.cendi.gov -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Greg Grossmeier Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 7:40 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: copyright fraud? Thanks to a co-worker, things are a little more clear... When you go to that Natural Disaster and Exteme Weather collection and click on their Terms of Service at the bottom, it brings you to the middle of their entire legalese. It starts at the Terms of Service and skips the Copyright Notice part. See: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/disaster/help.action?topic=terms_of_service So, in effect, the Copyright Notice part (quoted below) was not easily findable (I missed it!); there is no direct link to it that I could find. "Materials available on this website are the property of their respective copyright holders. Please see the individualized copyright notice that is printed within or appears with each document, and read the EBRARY TERMS OF SERVICE for information about what you may and may not do with the Materials available on this site. All rights not expressly granted herein are reserved to the copyright holders." Everything in the Terms of Service seem to suggest that ebrary holds the rights to those works and are restricting their use. So, they aren't placing a fraudulant copyright notice on the work, but instead are limiting reuse of public domain materials by contract (their ToS). Thus, no legal copyfraud, but ethical copyfraud (which, fortunately or unfortunately, is perfectly legal). Thanks to my coworker for the point, I completely missed that Copyright Notice piece at the top! Nevermind the whole paragraph on the first page that starts with: "To build this site, we gathered public domain PDF documents from government websites..." I think I was a little quick on the trigger... Best, Greg
- Prev by Date: RE: eBooks in Libraries a Thorny Problem, Says Macmillan CEO
- Next by Date: Re: eBooks in Libraries a Thorny Problem, Says Macmillan CEO
- Previous by thread: Laptops as ereaders
- Next by thread: Re: copyright fraud? Works of the U.S. Government
- Index(es):