[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Why people share information
- To: "liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Why people share information
- From: Cherry Gordon <cgordon5@une.edu.au>
- Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:12:53 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Interesting. This seems to be analogous with the advertising principle put forward by David Ogilvy in: Ogilvy on Advertising. London: Pan, 1983. ISBN 0330269852 (pbk) where he suggests a longer advertising article bringing out interesting facts hooks the potential reader. Cherry Gordon cgordon5@une.edu.au -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Joseph Esposito Sent: Wednesday, 10 February 2010 9:52 AM To: Liblicense-L@Lists. Yale. Edu Subject: Why people share information In case anyone missed it, here is an article from the NY Times on a study of why people share articles with one another: http://j.mp/bnccvz This is intriguing on a number of levels. First, it points to some of the appeal of various Web 2.0 devices. Second, the results themselves are surprising (e.g., science articles are shared more than other articles). Finally, it's all about the metadata: These are findings about how NY Times articles are shared. So now the Times is both first-rate content but also a source of metadata that invites intelligent extrapolation. I see an emerging revenue stream in that. Maybe the Times--or the Meta-Times--has a role in the future of networked information after all. Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: RE: Sub-sidy/scription for ArXiv
- Next by Date: RE: Sub-sidy/scription for ArXiv
- Previous by thread: Why people share information
- Next by thread: peer review
- Index(es):