[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
peer review
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: peer review
- From: "Nat Gustafson-Sundell" <n-gustafson-sundell@northwestern.edu>
- Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:19:50 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I'm sure everyone has seen: http://www.eurostemcell.org/commentanalysis/peer-review. As reported by new Scientist, there were two main reasons for this letter: 1)scientists attempting to suppress or delay publication of rival research, 2)national bias of peer reviewers. On a different note, has everyone seen that Answers Research Journal is to publish 'peer-reviewed' creationist 'research'. I guess the point will be to suppress any 'research' discussing anything that happened before 4004 bce. -Nat
- Prev by Date: RE: Sub-sidy/scription for ArXiv
- Next by Date: Workshop for your journals editors
- Previous by thread: Why people share information
- Next by thread: Workshop for your journals editors
- Index(es):