[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Critique of OA metric
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Critique of OA metric
- From: Sandy Thatcher <sgt3@psu.edu>
- Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:10:58 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
If this were true, then I would not lose so often when I compete for junior faculty's books in competition with presses like Cambridge, whose 500+ years of branding seem to count for a lot with the senior colleagues of these faculty who tell them that they will have a better chance of getting tenure if theory publishing with the more "prestigious" press! Sandy Thatcher Penn State University Press (only a little more than 50 years old) At 7:22 PM -0400 10/26/09, Ahmed Hindawi wrote: >The more important reason is that it is difficult to establish a >brand as a book publisher because authors don't expect that much >correlation between the quality of books published by a >particular publisher. The journal brand as a "Stamp of Quality" >of the articles it publishes is certainly much more visibile >than the publisher brand as a "Stamp of Quality" for the books >it publishes.
- Prev by Date: E-book panel at the Charleston Library Conference
- Next by Date: RE: Growth for STM publishers in 2008
- Previous by thread: Re: Critique of OA metric
- Next by thread: RE: Critique of OA metric
- Index(es):