[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
PLOS article metrics
- To: "liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: PLOS article metrics
- From: Joseph Esposito <espositoj@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:39:58 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Very good overview by Phil Davis of the new PLOS article-level metrics program. Here is the link: http://j.mp/2kAhaS The comments on Davis's post are good, too. One thing that Davis does not mention is that this too shall pass. The article-level metrics are a function of user activity, which is itself highly susceptible to the machinery of search-engine marketing and search-engine optimization (SEO is a subset of SEM). As authors and publishers become more aware of the value in driving up usage statistics, they will engage in more and more SEM and often SEO. Thus the competition for the 'best' article becomes entangled with the efforts of aggressive marketing. Authors and publishers who are less skilled at this will be left behind; the more skillful will invest greater and greater resources in SEM, driving up costs. This is just one of the many reasons that open access publishing is inherently more expensive than the toll-access form. But as Stevan Harnad likes to point out, it's not about the money. I wrote about this in 2004 in 'The Devil You Don't Know' http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1163/1083. Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: Re: US consumer purchase of international editions
- Next by Date: Re: Something from the New Yorker about Google Book Search
- Previous by thread: Library Journal editorial on Google book settlement
- Next by thread: Re: PLOS article metrics
- Index(es):