[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Rejecta Mathematica - a new twist on OA and peer review
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Rejecta Mathematica - a new twist on OA and peer review
- From: "David Prosser" <david.prosser@bodley.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:35:53 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
If the costs really are $0.32 per day then this may well be a solid and sustainable business plan - $120 per year is not a huge figure to raise. Interestingly, six papers have been published so far and if we see no more in 2009 (and I expect we will see more) then the cost per paper to the international community is $20 per paper. Significantly less than most pay-per-view offerings. David David C Prosser Director, SPARC Europe -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Philip Davis Sent: 19 August 2009 22:25 To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: Rejecta Mathematica - a new twist on OA and peer review Rejecta Mathematica appears to be based on a solid and sustainable business plan, which is composed of voluntary donations, t-shirt and coffee mug sales. http://math.rejecta.org/supporting-rejecta-mathematica Phil Davis
- Prev by Date: UC Academics Raise Major Concerns About Google Settlement
- Next by Date: Re: UC Academics Raise Major Concerns About Google Settlement
- Previous by thread: RE: Rejecta Mathematica - a new twist on OA and peer review
- Next by thread: Re: Do academic journals threaten advancement of science?
- Index(es):