[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Journal/Publisher 2010 price freeze info on MLA website
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Journal/Publisher 2010 price freeze info on MLA website
- From: Neil Renison <neil.renison@jcu.edu.au>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:06:31 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
"a journal's usage and its importance to the library customers and collection?" is ultimately the determining factor, but the argument is not quite so simple. In institutions like mine, cancellations during good times (i.e. when funds are available) tend only to happen if circumstances change and a journal is clearly no longer being used and is no longer relevant. Inertia may save such titles from cancellation in the short term; eventually they go. However when a library simply cannot afford to renew all it's subscriptions all sorts of factors have to be weighted and considered. "Usage" and "importance" are not exactly synonymous. Price will be one such factor and for me price restraint would add some weight to a decision to keep a subscription. Such publishers are the sort of people we would prefer to be doing business with. The reverse is that high priced journals that are also going to get even pricier are exposed to a bit more scrutiny, suspicion and serious consideration of alternative solutions. Publisher packages and deals complicate matters further, but the final outcome is dictated by the funds available and hundreds of separate and perhaps conflicting judgements. Among which for any one particular title the price or a price freeze may or may not be the deciding factor. So freezing prices won't protect journals from cancellation, but could well make a difference where the decision is between titles of "similar usage and importance to the library customers"; however that is reckoned. Nonetheless given a finite pool of money, freezing prices will surely maximise the number of subscriptions maintained across the industry. That may not advantage any particular publisher or shareholder, but seems a good outcome overall for publishing and its clients. Neil Renison - Librarian (Acquisitions Services) Eddie Koiki Mabo Library James Cook University Townsville QLD 4811 Australia Email: Neil.Renison@jcu.edu.au Phone: (07) 4781 5073 Fax: (07) 4781 5886 ************ Nawin Gupta wrote: > It is gratifying to see that a number of publishers are > foregoing price increases for the upcoming year. Anecdotal > evidence to date is that many of the libraries, if not most, > are expecting budget cuts of around 10% or more. Sadly, despite > the noble gestures of some, chances are that librarians would > still need to cut some subscriptions. > > If I may ask a question of librarians on this list: > > Would a journal that did not increase its subscription price > likely to be spared in your decision to cut? Or, are the > decisions likely to be based primarily on a journal's usage and > its importance to the library "customers" and collection? > > Nawin Gupta > www.nawingupta.com
- Prev by Date: Re: Privacy and the Google settlement (long, sorry)
- Next by Date: Elsevier Statement on the Challenging Economy
- Previous by thread: RE: Journal/Publisher 2010 price freeze info on MLA website
- Next by thread: Public Index to Discuss Google Book Search Settlement
- Index(es):