unsubbing from liblicense-l

[Liblicense-L Listowner <liblicen@pantheon.yale.edu>]

To subscribe or unsubscribe from liblicense-l, please visit the 
LIBLICENSE web site at:

www.library.yale.edu/~llicense

In the dark blue bar across the top, you will find a link that 
enables you to sub or susub, by clicking on the option you want 
and inputting your email address.

It takes seconds.

Sorry to lose you, The Moderators

***

On Tue, 26 May 2009, liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu wrote:

> This message was submitted by hiu@stanford.edu to list
> liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu.
>
> If you forward it back to the list, it will be distributed without the
> paragraphs above the dashed line.  You may edit the Subject: line and
> the text of the message before forwarding it back; otherwise do not
> modify anything else (that includes the spacing in the headers).
>
> It is strongly advised that you do not indent the message in any shape or
> form if you decide to forward it back, especially if it is MIME encoded.
> If your MUA wraps your reply around into another MIME message, you may
> run into problems if it modifies the headers that ListProc sent along in
> any shape or form; the headers shown below that listproc sent along
> should not be augmented or otherwise modified.
>
> If you edit the messages you receive into a digest, you will need to
> remove these paragraphs and the dashed line before mailing the result
> to the list. Finally, if you need more information from the author of
> this message, you should be able to do so by simply replying to this
> note.
>
>
>
> ------------------- Message requiring your approval ------------------
> From: hiu ho <hiu@stanford.edu>
> To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> Subject: Re: Supplying electronic articles via ILL
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> please unsubscribe me . thanks.  hiu
>
> Ivy Anderson wrote:
> > Colleagues,
> >
> > Of course I meant to say *print ILL* makes the lending
> > institution's job harder, not e-ILL -- responding to Liblicense
> > posts too late in the evening.
> >
> > - Ivy
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> > On Behalf Of Ivy Anderson
> > Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 5:07 PM
> > To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> > Subject: RE: Supplying electronic articles via ILL
> >
> > Sally,
> >
> > With widespread green OA policies that allow self-archiving of
> > author versions of articles, and with widespread 'scholarly
> > sharing' provisions in licenses that explicitly permit
> > scholar-to-scholar sharing, why does anyone still think that
> > electronic ILL poses a serious threat to subscriptions?  As I
> > said in my previous post, it's the CONTU provisions that are
> > universally accepted among libraries (at least in the U.S.) that
> > are the limiting factor. Electronic ILL makes the lending
> > institution's job harder, but that is not a disincentive to the
> > borrower.
> >
> > Ivy Anderson
> > Director of Collections
> > California Digital Library
> > University of California, Office of the President
> > ivy.anderson@ucop.edu
> > http://cdlib.org
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> >
> > I grant you that, if the scan is received in unprotected form, it
> > can still be redistributed (albeit not legally).  However, the
> > initial process does have the artificial 'technological' brake
> >
> > Sally
> >
> > Sally Morris
> > Partner, Morris Associates - Publishing Consultancy
> --
> Hiu H. Ho
> Manager, Business Services
>
> Stanford University Libraries
> Cecil H. Green Library
> 557 Escondido Mall
> Stanford, CA 94305-6004
> T 650.723.3221
> F 650.725.1548
> hiu@stanford.edu