Re: Blog vs. Peer Review Final Report: Lessons Learned

[James Knight <jlk34n@gmail.com>]

And...

> [2] Richard Feinman said: "This is a very dangerous precedent.
> Judging written reports should be done on content rather than on
> the prestige of the author and/or journal."
>
> Just curious...why is this this case "a very dangerous
> precedent"?

I had roughly the same question: what precedent? Spend one hour at the
reference desk of a medical library and, well, you get the picture.

-jk