[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Merck published fake journal
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Merck published fake journal
- From: <bill@multi-science.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 21:34:46 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Isn't it the case that sub prime publishing (and sub prime anything else for that matter) is more likely to come from businesses run by managers than those by owners? Managers tend to not necessarily care that much about what particular business they manage (nor even what particular industry that business is in) but focus more on their own career; owners however are focussed on their own business, deeply interested in it, its survival and any number of considerations surrounding it; all of which means they are not in the position of having one and only one benchmark, profit. An interesting case could be made that professional managers will run 'better' businesses in the short term, but the long term public good is better served by owner-managed businesses. Librarians, be careful with whom you do business! Bill Hughes (owner) Multi-Science Publishing
- Prev by Date: Re: Access to 2009 H1N1 Flu information
- Next by Date: RE: Merck published fake journal
- Previous by thread: RE: Merck published fake journal
- Next by thread: RE: Merck published fake journal
- Index(es):