[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Seven ARL Libraries Face Major Planned or Potential Budget Cuts
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Seven ARL Libraries Face Major Planned or Potential Budget Cuts
- From: "\"FrederickFriend\"" <ucylfjf@ucl.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 21:01:38 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I was also one of those who in the late 1990s supported the Big Deal development, in the UK through the Pilot Site Licence Initiative and its successor NESLI, now NESLi2, and I agree with Anthony that at the time it looked like a win/win/win situation. To many people it looks very different now. I do not want to get into a blame situation on the reasons why it looks so different, but rather point to the way the WWW and other technical developments have transformed the opportunities open to all stakeholders since the Big Deal was conceived. Academic research is now conducted in ways which are very different from the late 1990s, libraries are becoming electronic resource centres for far more than purchased or licensed content, and reader expectations have blossomed into new forms of content use like text-mining or data-mining. So where do we go from here? Any new model has to meet new expectations and opportunities, which for librarians and publishers means moving away from a silo mentality. It must be sustainable and affordable, which means a business model to which the world-wide academic community can commit. The best option I can see developing to meet opportunities and to be both sustainable and affordable is the gold OA publication charge model, which through bulk purchase could achieve the economies promised (but never fully realised) in the Big Deal model and also release the advantages of OA to stakeholders. To some gold OA bulk purchase may appear a radical solution, but the way academic research is developing that model and certain stakeholder roles could soon be by-passed by other more fundamental changes. I shall no doubt be criticised for ignoring the potential of self-archiving as the way forward, and by others as ignoring the complexities of any fundamental change in the world-wide research dissemination model. I am not ignoring those factors - they need to be examined carefully - but it seems clear that the Big Deal has had its day and we need to explore a viable and affordable alternative to meet the opportunities and challenges in the new environment. Fred Friend JISC Scholarly Communication Consultant Honorary Director Scholarly Communication UCL (N.B. The views expressed are my own and not necessarily those of any organization with which I am associated.)
- Prev by Date: RE: Merck published fake journal
- Next by Date: Re: Access to 2009 H1N1 Flu information
- Previous by thread: Re: Seven ARL Libraries Face Major Planned or Potential Budget Cuts
- Next by thread: Re: Seven ARL Libraries Face Major Planned or Potential Budget Cuts
- Index(es):