[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Merck published fake journal
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Merck published fake journal
- From: "David Prosser" <david.prosser@bodley.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 17:47:07 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Irony lovers will enjoy going back to 2004 and re-reading the evidence Crispin Davis, former CEO of Reed Elsevier, gave to the UK House of Commons Committee on Science and Technology. Right in the middle of this interesting practice Sir Crispin was commenting on the quality and objectivity safeguards of the subscription models - safeguards that would be undermined by open access. He also mentioned that 25% of Elsevier revenue came form the commercial sector, including Merck. We now know how that came about. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmsctech/399/4030106.htm (Answer to question 65) The Financial Times report tells us that the bogus Australasian Journal of Bone and Joint Medicine last published in 2005. Can anybody from Elsevier reading the list tell us when the last time a similar journal was published? David SPARC Europe Tel: +44 (0) 1865 277 614 Mobile: +44 (0) 7974 673 888 Web: www.sparceurope.org -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Kosecki, Stan Sent: 07 May 2009 21:31 To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: RE: Merck published fake journal Wednesday's US edition (May 6, 2009) of Financial Times has a story on this topic. --Stan Kosecki "Elsevier admits journal error" By Salamander Davoudi and Andrew Jack in London Published: May 5 2009 22:42 | Last updated: May 5 2009 22:42 http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/bab0fcf4-39a2-11de-b82d-00144feabdc0.html?nclick_check=1
- Prev by Date: The decline and fall of books
- Next by Date: Elsevier confirms 6 fake journals; more comments
- Previous by thread: RE: Merck published fake journal
- Next by thread: RE: Merck published fake journal
- Index(es):