[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Merck published fake journal
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: Merck published fake journal
- From: Jean-Claude Gu�don <jean.claude.guedon@umontreal.ca>
- Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 17:28:38 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I simply love this... After the subprime fiasco of bankers, the fake peer-reviewed journals from commercial publishers. What next? My imagination confesses not being strong enough to reach that level of reality, but it goes way beyond fiction. Kurt Vonnegut, where are you, now that we really need you? And what about quality assurance (a.k.a. added value)? Only possible conclusion: science is too important to be left in the hands of commercial publishers. Jean-Claude Guedon Le jeudi 07 mai 2009 a 16:30 -0400, Kosecki, Stan a ecrit : > Wednesday's US edition (May 6, 2009) of Financial Times has a story on > this topic. --Stan Kosecki > > "Elsevier admits journal error" By Salamander Davoudi and Andrew > Jack in London Published: May 5 2009 22:42 | Last updated: May 5 > 2009 22:42 > http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/bab0fcf4-39a2-11de-b82d-00144feabdc0.html?nclick_check=1 >
- Prev by Date: RE: Usage reporting (was: Seven ARL Libraries)
- Next by Date: The decline and fall of books
- Previous by thread: RE: Merck published fake journal
- Next by thread: RE: Merck published fake journal
- Index(es):