[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Abundant information, libre open access and information literacy
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Abundant information, libre open access and information literacy
- From: "Sally Morris \(Morris Associates\)" <sally@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 22:46:29 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I don't think anyone was suggesting that data mining is automatically allowed (I certainly wasn't). What I, at least, was trying to say was that it does not require the content to be freely available (any more than indexing by search engines does). The content owner needs to make it open to the appropriate crawlers (or whatever the equivalent is in data-mining terms), which is not necessarily the same as making it open to everyone. Sally Morris Email: sally@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Klaus Graf Sent: 02 May 2009 00:16 To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: Abundant information, libre open access and information literacy I cannot see any evidence that data mining is in all cases allowed according US fair use. There is strong evidence that it isn't allowed according other copyright laws e.g. of Germany: http://archiv.twoday.net/stories/4851871/ Klaus Graf
- Prev by Date: Re: Abundant information, libre open access and information literacy
- Next by Date: Merck published fake journal
- Previous by thread: Re: Abundant information, libre open access and information literacy
- Next by thread: Re: University of Maryland's Open Access Deliberations
- Index(es):