[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Electronic or print?
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: Electronic or print?
- From: Sandy Thatcher <sgt3@psu.edu>
- Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:22:23 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
And the lesson from Gutenberg-e was that, unless the authors could produce a print version of their "enhanced" dissertations, journals in their field would not review them and they would not get the credit they needed to win tenure and promotion. Any print version, of course, could not represent the full content of the electronic version as they were "multi-dimensional" works of scholarship. As all of us know who have inhabited the academy for a long time, old habits die hard!
Sandy Thatcher
Penn State University Press
I have long thought of what we are doing not as electronic publishing, but as distributed print publishing... And as long as the articles we produce are artificially limited by the 2-dimensional nature of paper, and the resultant narrative structure, I suspect it will stay that way. If/when publishers (and, of course, their authors) start to think of presenting information in more useful ways that are enabled by the multi-dimensional Web, then printing them out will become an impossibility. Sally Morris Email: sally@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk
- Prev by Date: RE: University of Marlyland's Open Access Deliberations
- Next by Date: RE: Electronic or print? Publishing in 3D?
- Previous by thread: RE: Electronic or print?
- Next by thread: Google seeks more time in Book Search case
- Index(es):