[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Digital publishing and university presses
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Digital publishing and university presses
- From: "Sally Morris \(Morris Associates\)" <sally@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:11:15 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Apologies if, in coming late to this discussion, some or all of the following points have already been made! To equate the per-page cost of printing out on a local printer with the per-page subscription price of a journal is erroneous for a number of reasons: 1) Most of us are not lucky enough to have double-sided, colour printers (or binding equipment). Thus we use twice as much paper as necessary (more, if the journal page is smaller than A4). What's more, we end up with a pile of loose pages - no great problem for a single article, but hopeless for a whole journal issue. The publisher's production cost includes binding. 2) Per-page manufacturing costs on local printers do not decrease with quantity; printers' costs do, slightly, since there is a set-up element in the cost 3) Publishers' manufacturing costs also include typesetting - a major cost element for a short-run journal. Nevertheless, all production costs amount to a relatively small proportion of total journal costs (I remember estimates of around 20% from my days working for a large publisher). 4) Publishers' overall costs also, of course, include the costs of editing - both the support (financial, technical and staff) to external editors, and the cost of technical and/or copy-editing. Then there's marketing, sales, subscription administration and so forth - not to mention the costs associated with any online version. And then the publisher needs to make a profit on top, to arrive at the price. Thus it is pretty meaningless, surely, to divide the subscription price by the number of pages and then compare this with the cost per page of simply printing out on one's local printer. To see all this explained very much more cogently than I can, see Don King's article 'The cost of journal publishing: a literature review and commentary' in Learned Publishing 20: 2 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/174148507X183551 - open access) Sally Sally Morris Partner, Morris Associates - Publishing Consultancy South House, The Street Clapham, Worthing, West Sussex BN13 3UU, UK Tel: +44(0)1903 871286 Fax: +44(0)8701 202806 Email: sally@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Joseph Esposito Sent: 18 April 2009 00:37 To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: RE: Digital publishing and university presses What everybody knows is that the cost to the publisher is less than the cost to the consumer. The publisher pays the cost of manufacturing (Sandy's figure), the consumer pays the cost of the publication (Kevin Smith's figure). Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: Internet Archive intervenes in Google book settlement
- Next by Date: The American Journal of Psychiatry Named
- Previous by thread: RE: Digital publishing and university presses
- Next by thread: RE: Digital publishing and university presses
- Index(es):