[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dramatic Growth of Open Access - March 31, 2009
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Dramatic Growth of Open Access - March 31, 2009
- From: Greg Tananbaum <gtananbaum@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 23:28:59 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Lots of figures to chew on here, Heather. You write that DOAJ is increasing at the rate of two titles per day. Can you elucidate? Are two new open access journals actually launching every day? Or, rather, is this a function of DOAJ catching up on its housekeeping, as it were? A quick check of their site indicates the latter (103 titles added in the past 30 days, but only six of these show a launch date of 2009). I ask not to throw cold water on the data, but rather to better understand them. A related question is how many of these journals are new undertakings vs. how many are existing publications that have merely switched business models. This harkens back to the content proliferation thread that unspooled on Liblicense last week. It took DOAJ just 16 months to grow from 3,000 to 4,000 titles. How many of these 1,00 titles were new journals launched in that time period? I trust someone on the list can provide those data. 1,000 new DOAJ-listed titles in a few years, two new DOAJ-listed titles per day. It would be fascinating to better understand whether these are filling an information gap or contributing to a glut. I ask this as an OA agnostic. Best, Greg -- Greg Tananbaum Consulting Services at the Intersection of Technology, Content, & Academia (510) 295-7504 greg@scholarnext.com http://www.scholarnext.com
- Prev by Date: Re: Article in "Inside HigherEd"
- Next by Date: RE: Dramatic Growth of Open Access - March 31, 2009
- Previous by thread: Dramatic Growth of Open Access - March 31, 2009
- Next by thread: RE: Dramatic Growth of Open Access - March 31, 2009
- Index(es):