[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Article in "Inside HigherEd"
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Article in "Inside HigherEd"
- From: richards1000@comcast.net
- Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 23:17:59 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I had asked a previous poster to identify information resources that are effectively unavailable to scholars in the U.S. As no response has been posted, I'd like to respond respecting legal scholarly publishing in the U.S. In the U.S. legal publishing market, there are, I believe, two categories of materials that at times are effectively unavailable to U.S. law professors because of expense: (1) practitioner-oriented materials (periodicals - usually newsletters - and treatises), and (2) certain scholarly materials (some monographs - often festschriften or other article collections - and certain journals) on international law or the law of non-U.S. countries, generally published in continental Europe. Respecting category (1), unavailability is usually no great loss because with rare exceptions, these materials usually have little or no scholarly value (the request is often intended to fill a non-scholarly need, such as for consulting work or a practice-skills course), and the library can often negotiate with the law professor to avoid the request or to find an affordable substitute. Respecting category (2), these are often high-quality scholarly materials, and ILL and document delivery at times fail, for any number of reasons: the work has recently been published and no library has a copy available for lending, no library in the ILL network has licensed ILL rights respecting a digital copy, or the borrowing library has exhausted its copyright limit respecting the desired journal. I suspect that in the current economic environment, the number of titles in category (2) will grow, as more U.S. academic law libraries cut back on monograph purchasing and the licensing of costly journals, or they limit the rights they license in order to reduce cost. I'd be very interested to know whether either scenario rings true in other fields, and especially in other professional scholarly fields. I suspect the category (1) problem is endemic to professional fields. Robert Richards ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Robert C. Richards, Jr., J.D.*, M.S.L.I.S., M.A. Law Librarian & Legal Information Consultant Philadelphia, PA richards1000@comcast.net * Member New York bar, retired status. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
- Prev by Date: Dramatic Growth of Open Access - March 31, 2009
- Next by Date: Re: Dramatic Growth of Open Access - March 31, 2009
- Previous by thread: Dramatic Growth of Open Access - March 31, 2009
- Next by thread: Yesterday ( was : RE: Mergers Create Uber Publisher )
- Index(es):