[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Abundant information, libre open access and information literacy
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
 - Subject: Re: Abundant information, libre open access and information literacy
 - From: "Anthony Watkinson" <anthony.watkinson@btinternet.com>
 - Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:39:22 EDT
 - Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
 - Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
 
It would be most helpful if Klaus Lang could explain which part of this blog he is referring to and why he is able to be so dogmatic. I do not know if any other readers of this list have had difficulty finding relevant bits in a blog that unfurls for several pages when one clicks on the reference. Anthony ----- Original Message ----- From: "Klaus Graf" <klausgraf@googlemail.com> To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 10:10 PM Subject: Re: Abundant information, libre open access and information literacy > 2009/3/27 Sally Morris (Morris Associates) > <sally@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk>: > >> Heather, you have missed one point that I tried to make quite >> carefully. 'Free to Reuse' is NOT what is needed for text >> mining, etc - in fact such content doesn't even need to be free >> to access. > > This is wrong, see e.g. http://wwmm.ch.cam.ac.uk/blogs/murrayrust/ > > Klaus Graf
- Prev by Date: Re: "Accepted Manuscript"
 - Next by Date: Any one know a publisher who have China Programm
 - Previous by thread: Re: Abundant information, libre open access and information literacy
 - Next by thread: Re: Abundant information, libre open access and information literacy
 - Index(es):
 
