[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: "Accepted Manuscript"
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: "Accepted Manuscript"
- From: "B.G. Sloan" <bgsloan2@yahoo.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:37:47 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Joe Esposito said: "Harvard and MIT are private institutions. What they do is their business. We insist that they comply with the law. But beyond that? I think it unseemly to tell these institutions that they should do this or that." I don't buy that. There is nothing wrong with putting public pressure on private institutions. Of course they don't have to do what we suggest, but I don't think it's "unseemly" for us to make the suggestions. Bernie Sloan Sora Associates Bloomington, IN --- On Thu, 3/26/09, Joseph Esposito <espositoj@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Joseph Esposito <espositoj@gmail.com> > Subject: RE: "Accepted Manuscript" > To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu > Date: Thursday, March 26, 2009, 6:15 PM > Sandy, > > Let's be consistent here. Harvard and MIT are private > institutions. What they do is their business. We insist that > they comply with the law. But beyond that? I think it > unseemly to tell these institutions that they should do this or > that. I would as soon tell my neighbor that I don't like her > drapes (I hope she is not on this list). > > The NIH is a different matter. It is a governmental > institution, and we all have a right to tell the leadership > what they should do. And we all do. > > Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: [no subject]
- Next by Date: Re: "Accepted Manuscript"
- Previous by thread: Re: "Accepted Manuscript"
- Next by thread: Re: "Accepted Manuscript"
- Index(es):