[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another Winning Article From OA's Chronicler
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Another Winning Article From OA's Chronicler
- From: Stevan Harnad <amsciforum@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:48:14 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Joseph Esposito wrote: > The real thrust of the world of open access is neither green > nor gold, but what I have termed "unwashed," the growing--world > of material that is not peer-reviewed.... > > The evidence is mounting that many advocates of open access have never > actually used the Internet... > > Increasingly peer review will be post-publication, not > pre-publication. I suspect all this talk about Gold and Green > is a waste of everybody's time. Or could it be that some of the opponents of Open Access to the 2.5 million articles published annually in the planet's 25,000 peer-reviewed scholarly and scientific journals have never actually done any scholarly or scientific research, hence never published in a refereed journal, and never had any need to consult one for their scholarly and scientific research? Stevan Harnad
- Prev by Date: RE: Post at Scholarly Kitchen
- Next by Date: New Report: Publishers allow more than authors think
- Previous by thread: RE: Another Winning Article From OA's Chronicler
- Next by thread: Post at Scholarly Kitchen
- Index(es):