[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
DC Principless' petition
- To: AMERICAN-SCIENTIST-OPEN-ACCESS-FORUM@listserver.sigmaxi.org
- Subject: DC Principless' petition
- From: Walker@lists.yale.edu, Thomas J <tjw.--.ufl.edu@lists.yale.edu>
- Date: Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 12:11 PM
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
This item appeared in a recent issue of the e-newsletter of one of the scientific societies to which I belong. (XXX replaces the name of the society. Petition in Support of Society Publishers XXX is a member of the Washington DC Principles Coalition for Free Access to Science, which is a coalition of not-for-profit publishers that supports providing free public access to published research findings in their journals. The coalition is opposed to government mandated requirements of when and where journal access must be provided, such as the current NIH mandate to have all accepted NIH-funded manuscripts posted on PubMed Central. There is a petition on the DC Principles Coalition website for people to sign to express support for scientific society publishers. As we move into 2009 and the new Congress, DC Principles member organizations want to draw attention to the petition and to encourage their own society members to sign on to it. At some point in time during the coming year, the coalition will point to the number of people who support its mission. Please take a minute to read this short petition and add your name in support of XXX and the DC Principles coalition. [The item links to the petition (http://www.dcprinciples.org/DCPS_PETITION/DCPS_PETITION/Petition.aspx) in its title and in its last sentence.] I was dismayed at the item and am protesting these examples: (1) "XXX is a member of the Washington DC Principles Coalition for Free Access to Science...." ("Coalition" is not part of the organization's name.) (2) "The coalition is opposed to government mandated requirements of when and where journal access must be provided, such as the current NIH mandate ...." (As indicated at the end of the same sentence, the NIH mandate pertains to access to specific accepted manuscripts, not access to journals.) (3) "Please take a minute to read this short petition and add your name in support of XXX and the DC Principles coalition." (The majority of the members of XXX, or of its governing board, would probably not agree that advocating the repeal of the NIH mandate supports XXX.) I post this to inform the list of the petition and to ask if anyone knows of similar examples of society members being asked to sign it. ==================================== Thomas J. Walker Department of Entomology & Nematology PO Box 110620 (or Natural Area Drive) University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0620 E-mail: tjw@ufl.edu FAX: (352)392-0190 Web: http://tjwalker.ifas.ufl.edu ====================================
- Prev by Date: Re: Google Analytics
- Next by Date: RE: Google Analytics
- Previous by thread: Send Us Your Questions on the NIH Public Access Policy - For the Open Forum at MLA 09
- Next by thread: Harvard Medical School Proposes Harvard's 3rd Green OA Mandate
- Index(es):