[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OA in Legal Publishing: Durham Statement on Open Access to Legal Scholarship
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: OA in Legal Publishing: Durham Statement on Open Access to Legal Scholarship
- From: Shourin Sen <shourinsen@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 23:27:11 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Dear Listserve: At the risk of beating a dead horse, I'd like to provide a few words in support of the expansive use of the term "open access" adopted in the Durham Statement. The phrase is powerful marketing. About a year and a half ago, I was shopping an article to various law journals. One of the questions I asked when evaluating offers was whether a particular journal offered "Open Access Principles." Creative Commons and Science Commons had within the past year or so announced a new initiative (with the flashy title "Open Access") that encouraged journals to allow their authors latitude to publish in electronic repositories. Perhaps not coincidentally, one of the first journals to adopt the initiative was the Duke Law Journal. The terms of the initiative, and giving the initiative the title "Open Access Principles," flipped the negotiation process. Instead of entering into an adversarial negotiation for future use of my article, as was common in the past, all of the journals I spoke to welcomed immediate third-party electronic publishing, and gave me free reign to republish the article in other print journals or a book within a year. I anticipate the Durham Statement will have a similar effect. There still remains a sizable minority of legal journals -- perhaps 30-40% -- who do not offer their articles at stable URLs immediately upon publication. At the risk of misrepresenting the reasons for this, I suspect that many of the journals either haven't developed their websites, or are delaying publication out of deference to their print sales. If I end up seeking publication in any of these journals, I will be able to point to a specific initiative that has an attractive name, and was adopted by the representatives of a number prestigious universities. We shouldn't underestimate how powerful this is as a negotiation tool. I anticipate that within the next six months every journal will have adopted the terms of the Durham Statement. Thank you to all who developed and executed the Statement. Best, Shourin Sen
- Prev by Date: Re: ALA, ARL, ACRL To File Amicus Brief in Google Book Search=09Settlement
- Next by Date: RE: Preserving digital only materials
- Previous by thread: Re: ALA, ARL, ACRL To File Amicus Brief in Google Book Search=09Settlement
- Next by thread: Important information regarding journal transfers to SAGE
- Index(es):