[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ALA, ARL, ACRL To File Amicus Brief in Google Book Search=09Settlement
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: ALA, ARL, ACRL To File Amicus Brief in Google Book Search=09Settlement
- From: Klaus Graf <klausgraf@googlemail.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 23:18:09 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
2009/3/3 B.G. Sloan <bgsloan2@yahoo.com>: > Sandy Thatcher said: > > "Doesn't an amicus, by definition, have to be an amicus of one of > the contesting parties?" > > I'm not a lawyer, but I did take six years of Latin. :-) > > The full term is "amicus curiae", which translates to "friend of > the court" (i.e., not necessarily a friend to one of the parties > in a case or settlement). =A0The Merriam-Webster definition of > "amicus curiae" pretty much sums it up: "one (as a professional > person or organization) that is not a party to a particular > litigation but that is permitted by the court to advise it in > respect to some matter of law that directly affects the case in > question." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amicus_curiae Klaus Graf ---2071850956-1505591783-1236140270=:16847--
- Prev by Date: March issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter
- Next by Date: Re: OA in Legal Publishing: Durham Statement on Open Access to Legal Scholarship
- Previous by thread: March issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter
- Next by thread: Re: OA in Legal Publishing: Durham Statement on Open Access to Legal Scholarship
- Index(es):