[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pirates vs. University Presses
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Pirates vs. University Presses
- From: Sandy Thatcher <sgt3@psu.edu>
- Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:22:35 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Does the end justify the means? With attitudes like this, it's no wonder that university presses are suffering from piracy, too. And unlike the Harry Potter books, which will still sell millions of copies even with piracy rampant, scholarly books often have very small markets, which can easily be completely destroyed by such piracy. Does Mr. Graf want to see a world where no presses exist and all the publishing becomes self-publishing by scholars and peer review is done after publication? That is a sure way to exacerbate the problem of information overload from which we are all suffering too much already! P.S. We presses would, of course, welcome a world in which our parent universities completely subsidized our operations, so that we could publish everything free to the end user. But does anybody know of a university that is willing to do this? >Spreading knowledge is the same like stealing a book? If the law >says this it is something wrong with the law. > >Klaus Graf > >2009/2/19 Joachim Engelland <joachim.engelland@engelland.com>: >> I am surprised by the question mark. >> >> There is also no legal difference between stealing a scientific > > book or a collection of poems from a library.
- Prev by Date: RE: NIH issues
- Next by Date: RE: NIH issues
- Previous by thread: RE: Pirates vs. University Presses
- Next by thread: Boston University and Open Access
- Index(es):