[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Pirates vs. University Presses
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Pirates vs. University Presses
- From: "Joseph Esposito" <espositoj@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:25:38 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Sigh. It's worth reminding ourselves from time to time that there is no knowledge in a book, there are no ideas in a library. Knowledge and ideas can reside in only one place, and that is a human brain. In books and libraries we have the representations of ideas. These representations can be copyrighted, but the ideas and knowledge cannot. We cannot ask the law to do what the law cannot do; as Samuel Johnson said, "How small of all that human hearts endure / That part which laws or kings can cause or cure." The law cannot make wax figures spring to life or make darkness visible. Only Milton could do that, and he did it in a poem. Joe Esposito -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Klaus Graf Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 4:39 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: Pirates vs. University Presses Spreading knowledge is the same like stealing a book? If the law says this it is something wrong with the law. Klaus Graf 2009/2/19 Joachim Engelland <joachim.engelland@engelland.com>: > I am surprised by the question mark. > > There is also no legal difference between stealing a scientific > book or a collection of poems from a library.
- Prev by Date: RE: NIH issues
- Next by Date: RE: NIH issues
- Previous by thread: Re: Pirates vs. University Presses
- Next by thread: Re: Pirates vs. University Presses
- Index(es):