[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: OCLC's New License for Bibliographic Records
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: OCLC's New License for Bibliographic Records
- From: Thomas Krichel <krichel@openlib.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:10:20 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
richards1000@comcast.net writes > The Guardian of London > recently featured an article discussing this matter: > http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/jan/22/library-search-engines-books. Thank you for posting a link to this. It is a masterfully written review of the issue. And it suggests, quite subtly, that the policy of restricting commercial use is a factual metadata database such OCLC's WorldCat is the wrong thing to do. I have been saying that for years. By restricting commercial use, OCLC destroy some of the value of the work of their membership. I think there are some general lessons that go beyond the case of book metadata records into the wide issue of constructing and maintaining metadata datasets. Recently I put some of my thoughts on this matter into a thinking piece for the ASIST bulletin http://openlib.org/home/krichel/papers/kuyus.html Cheers, Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel skype: thomaskrichel
- Prev by Date: RE: Darnton on the Google settlement
- Next by Date: RE: Darnton on the Google settlement
- Previous by thread: OCLC's New License for Bibliographic Records
- Next by thread: RE: OCLC's New License for Bibliographic Records
- Index(es):