[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Darnton on the Google settlement
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Darnton on the Google settlement
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rick.anderson@utah.edu>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:21:24 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> There is, alas, a very > significant amount of labor involved for publishers to > investigate what digital rights they have in the books Google > has digitized and to negotiate with authors over display and > other types of rights they share under the settlement. This is > hardly just a "free ride" for publishers. True -- it's essentially a free ride for the general public, but not for publishers. However, my understanding (which may be flawed) is that publishers who choose not to participate can withdraw their books from the program very easily, and therefore end up no worse off than they were before the project. > And I suppose > librarians from the participating libraries would point to the > significant labor involved in making books available to Google > for digitization. I'd love to hear from participant libraries on this score. How much labor was it for them? Of course, we should bear in mind that those libraries got more out of the project than the general public does; they got permanent, complete, locally-held copies of the digitized books from their own collections. > Google has, remember, not > contributed any content at all itself, just the technology. Google also contributed massive amounts of labor. That's not trivial either. > 3) Rick's reminder to librarians that this settlement provides a > great deal more access to more books than people have ever had > before makes me think that the same could be said about the > whole STM publishing industry. Librarians like to complain > about "locked up" content, high prices, etc., but the reality > is that if the commercial sector had not stepped in to support > the rapid growth of science in the wake of WW II, we would all > be a lot poorer for it in terms of available resources. Couldn't agree more. --- Rick Anderson Assoc. Dir. for Scholarly Resources & Collections Marriott Library University of Utah rick.anderson@utah.edu 801-721-1687
- Prev by Date: JSTOR/Ithaka Merger
- Next by Date: Re: OCLC's New License for Bibliographic Records
- Previous by thread: Darnton on the Google settlement
- Next by thread: RE: Darnton on the Google settlement
- Index(es):