[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should university presses adopt an OA model for all of their scholarly books?
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Should university presses adopt an OA model for all of their scholarly books?
- From: "Joseph J. Esposito" <espositoj@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 16:58:32 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Let's hope that the OA movement follows Heather's financial guidelines. Joe Esposito ----- Original Message ----- From: "Heather Morrison" <heatherm@eln.bc.ca> To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 12:57 PM Subject: RE: Should university presses adopt an OA model for all of their scholarly books? > Nawin Gupta wrote: > > Here is an approximation of costs for purposes of this > discussion: > > Managing Editor - ranging from half-time to full-time with an > editorial assistant - $30,000 to $100,000 > > Editorial Office - $5,000 to $25,000 > > Editorial Processing, from acceptance to ready for publishing in > print and online, including copy-editing and peer review system - > ~ $100/page; ranging from $40,000 (for a quarterly journal with > 100 editorial pages per issue) to $200,000 for around 2,000 > editorial pages > > *** > > Questions: > > 1. Can you clarify that these are two ways of expressing > editing costs (Editorial Staff + Office), OR Editorial > processing costs? Or am I misreading this? > > 2. $100 per page for copyediting and peer review seems very > steep. Is as example of a journal where these functions are > provided by paid editorial staff? > > Comment: > > The cost estimates for university press publishing provided by > Gupta and Thatcher are very different. This is quite common in > scholarly publishing, and makes much more sense than one would > think at first. Almost anything in scholarly publishing can be > done either on a purely volunteer / in-kind support basis, or by > paying for services, or something in between (e.g., an editorial > salary only partially reflecting the work involved). Because > this is part of the work of the scholar, there can be a vast > difference in cost which does not necessarily correlate with > quality. Some of the society journals are produced at very low > costs compared with the commercial sector, for example, yet are > very highly regarded for their quality, often moreso than > commercial journals. > > Any opinion expressed in this e-mail is that of the author alone, > and does not represent the opinion or policy of BC Electronic > Library Network or Simon Fraser University Library. > > Heather Morrison, MLIS > The Imaginary Journal of Poetic Economics > http://poeticeconomics.blogspot.com
- Prev by Date: Re: Google v. the Web?
- Next by Date: Interlibrary loan language in site license - NEED OPINION
- Previous by thread: RE: Should university presses adopt an OA model for all of their scholarly books?
- Next by thread: Questions about Google Books settlement
- Index(es):