[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[no subject]
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- From: "Joseph J. Esposito" <espositoj@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 07:12:59 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
The difference is the marketing costs and all that comes with it. The Penn State journals are part of the Muse aggregation. The Chicago journals are marketed on a direct basis. Joe Esposito ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sandy Thatcher" <sgt3@psu.edu> To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 6:59 AM Subject: RE: Should university presses adopt an OA model for all of their scholarly books? > One wonders why.... I was assuming a quarterly journal with > about 96 pages per issue. There are of course journals that > publish more frequently and have many more pages annually than > 4 x 96, as well as some with complicated typesetting, but I > wanted to keep my estimate simple, representing what I consider > to be the "typical" journal in these fields. I'd love to see > the breakdown of costs that add up to more than $100,000 per > journal. Can you supply them, from memory or otherwise? > > P.S. Our Press publishes 11 journals in the humanities and > social sciences for a total cost of around $185,000 annually, > and my figure of $15,000 is rounded off from that experience. > Copyediting for most of them is paid for by the editorial > office, not the Press, so if that expense were added to the mix > for all of our journals, the total would probably round off to > $20,000. > > Sandy Thatcher > Penn State University Press > > >>It is an interesting thought, but, based on my experience at a >>university press that publishes nearly 50 journals, Sandy's >>numbers are off by a long shot. Average costs per journal at >>this press, excluding PPP, were well over $100,000 per journal >>per year in humanities and social sciences. >> >>Nawin Gupta >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu >>[mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Sandy Thatcher >>Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 9:47 PM >>To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu >>Subject: Re: Should university presses adopt an OA model for all of their >>scholarly books? >> >>My own recent back-of-the-envelope calculations showed that it >>would cost universities a total of $14 million annually to >>publish all university press journals and $200 million to publish >>all university press books annually as open access. This is based >>on the assumption that the average annual cost of publishing a >>journal in humanities and social sciences in university presses >>is $15,000 and that presses account for roughly 700 journals >>overall, and that the average cost of publishing a monograph is >>$20,000 and that the annual output of presses collectively is >>10,000 titles. These figures, of course, exclude all costs >>associated with printing, binding, and shipping physical copies, >>including warehousing. (Those costs constitute roughly 30% of the >>overall cost of publishing a monograph.) If POD is provided, >>there would of course be some income stream generated to offset >>those costs, but also some extra costs coming from the >>manufacturing and distribution of the POD copies. But when you >>think that even without generating any income, all the output of >>university presses, both journals and books, could be made OA for >>a total annual cost of about $214 million, that seems like a >>possibly wise investment--especially when you consider that this >>amount probably is less than the total of annual salaries for >>Division 1 football coaches! And if this cost were shared equally >>among all 3,000 American colleges, it would amount to less than >>$72,000 per university annually, a piddling amount. If the >>Carnegie classification were used as a basis for charging >>universities proportionate fees according to FTE student or >>faculty count, most colleges would pay far less than this. >> >>So, do I hear a motion for funding university press operations so >>that all of our output could be made available OA--and we can >>stop arguing about copyright? >> >>P.S. Maybe have Google contribute its $125 million to this goal >>instead of paying legal fees and startup costs of the Book Rights >>Registry for the settlement? >> >>Sandy Thatcher >>Penn State University Press
- Prev by Date: Questions about Google Books settlement
- Next by Date: Re: Should university presses adopt an OA model for all of their scholarly books?
- Previous by thread: Questions about Google Books settlement
- Next by thread: DRIVER: two press releases
- Index(es):