[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
More on Google-Publisher settlement
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: More on Google-Publisher settlement
- From: "Joseph J. Esposito" <espositoj@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 18:31:17 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
>From the Electronic Frontier Foundation's commentary on the >settlement: " Innovation: It seems likely that the "nondisplay uses" of Google's scanned corpus of text will end up being far more important than anything else in the agreement. Imagine the kinds of things that data mining all the world's books might let Google's engineers build: automated translation, optical character recognition, voice recognition algorithms. And those are just the things we can think of today. Under the agreement, Google has unrestricted, royalty-free access to this corpus. The agreement gives libraries their own copy of the corpus, and allows them to make it available to "certified" researchers for "nonconsumptive" research, but will that be enough?" Joe Esposito
- Prev by Date: Re: Authors, publishers, settle suit with Google
- Next by Date: Re: Authors, publishers, settle suit with Google
- Previous by thread: Google Book Search & Resellers of GovWorks
- Next by thread: November issue of the SPARC Open Access Newsletter
- Index(es):