[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New US Bill re. Copyright/Federal Funding
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: New US Bill re. Copyright/Federal Funding
- From: Peter Hirtle <pbh6@cornell.edu>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:46:46 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
At 04:01 AM 9/23/2008, Sandy Thatcher wrote: >As a footnote, I would add that university presses are concerned >about the government's move to make the papers of the Founding >Fathers, as published with editorial apparatus by a number of >presses, freely available on the Web without compensation to the >presses or editors, whose work has been supported only in part >by federal funding and in substantial part by private parties >also. This kind of expropriation would severely undermine the >ability of presses to continue publishing these valuable papers. There is reason to be concerned about this initiative, but not for the reasons that Sandy outlines. You can see my blog posting called "Free the Founding Fathers!" at http://blog.librarylaw.com/librarylaw/2008/06/free-the-foundi.html for the details, but the heart of the problem is that NARA seems to feel that the best way for people to get access to volumes whose editing and often publication costs have already been paid for is by having people subscribe to expensive university press delivery systems that limit how the work can be used. There is no question that the editorial work of the projects has been top-notch, if sorely underutilized. Similarly, some university presses are providing useful interfaces with value-added features that are well worth the subscription costs. There is no reason, however, that the government should not also take advantage of its license (a condition of providing the grant) to make this material available for free. If editorial projects do not like the government's license, they should not have accepted the editorial funding - just as publishers who do not like the NIH mandate should decline to publish articles funded by NIH (rather than trying to interfere with the author's rights as the copyright owner to license things as he or she sees fit). Peter B. Hirtle CUL Intellectual Property Officer Scholarly Resources and Special Collections Cornell University Library Ithaca, NY 14853-5301 peter.hirtle@cornell.edu http://www.copyright.cornell.edu
- Prev by Date: Need for access to print
- Next by Date: SLA Copyright Program
- Previous by thread: Re: New US Bill re. Copyright/Federal Funding
- Next by thread: RE: New US Bill re. Copyright/Federal Funding
- Index(es):