[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: concepts of perpetuity
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: concepts of perpetuity
- From: "Sally Morris \(Morris Associates\)" <sally@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:43:18 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
What Portico and other preservation activities are doing is great and extremely important, but I don't believe it's actually what libraries are looking for when they say 'perpetual access'. We are still mixing up very different issues. I really wish we could abolish the phrase 'perpetual access' entirely, and say 'continuing access' or even 'post-cancellation access' for the licence term that triggered this discussion, and 'long-term preservation (and emergency access)' for the Portico-like efforts. Nobody can say 'for ever'! Sally Morris Consultant, Morris Associates (Publishing Consultancy) South House, The Street Clapham, Worthing, West Sussex BN13 3UU, UK Email: sally@morris-assocs.demon.co.uk -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Eileen Fenton Sent: 29 August 2008 03:02 To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: RE: concepts of perpetuity Although removed from Ann's original question, this thread has brought into sharp relief the challenges associated with the assurance of continuing or "perpetual" access to e-journals. Provision of subscribed-to content on media is neither practical for publishers and libraries, as Tracey Thompson so clearly notes, nor does it assure the viable long-term preservation that enables access. At Portico, a not-for-profit archive of scholarly literature published in electronic form, we are addressing the need for active, long-term preservation and ongoing access. Portico is preserving nearly 8,000 journals and more than 4,400 e-books on behalf of its library and publisher participants. For approximately 85% of the e-journals and all of the e-books, publishers have designated Portico as one means to meet libraries' ongoing access needs. So if a library that participates in Portico has cancelled a license, they may turn to the Portico archive for ongoing access without resort to locally loaded, managed, and maintained tapes, CDs or servers. Nearly 470 libraries from around the world, including many smaller or mid-size libraries that have not traditionally considered preservation a part of their mandate, now rely upon and support the Portico archive. This broad base of support expresses the new reality that long-term digital preservation is as essential to continuing access to e-journals as physical shelves have been for print materials. Eileen Fenton Executive Director, Portico www.portico.org 609.986.2215
- Prev by Date: RE: concepts of perpetuity
- Next by Date: RE: concepts of perpetuity
- Previous by thread: RE: concepts of perpetuity
- Next by thread: RE: concepts of perpetuity
- Index(es):