[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: concepts of perpetuity
- To: "liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: concepts of perpetuity
- From: "Emery, Jill" <j.emery@austin.utexas.edu>
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:44:50 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
It should be noted that Sage publications Inc purchased CQ Press in May 2008. At this time, no new license agreement for the CQ Press online content has been forthcoming from Sage Publications Inc and libraries who have CQ Press electronic subscriptions are operating under the understanding that their original licenses with CQ Press are still valid. In the press release about the buy-out that was distributed 30 May 2008, there is only mention that CQ Press will remain a separate division based in Washington, D.C. and all the employees in the senior management team would stay in place. If we review the Project Transfer Code of Practice, section 7, "The Receiving Publisher will honour any perpetual access rights to previously published content which have been granted by the Transferring Publisher with the authority of the journal owner." CQ press/Sage is upholding this tenet of the Project Transfer Code for 2008. Under the current license, the answer to Ann's question is no, the current contract prevails. Since the memorandum received at this institution states that the perpetual access fees will be applied in the next calendar year, 2009, libraries and librarians are left to wonder if this means new contracts are also being drafted by the new management of this content. At which point, we're all back at the negotiation table in regards to these fees. Jill Emery Head of Acquisitions University of Texas Libraries Austin, TX 78713 e: j.emery@austin.utexas.edu -----Original Message----- From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu On Behalf Of Macklin, Lisa Alsing Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 9:24 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: RE: concepts of perpetuity Ann, Does the contract include language that the terms cannot be changed unless in a writing signed by both parties (or something to that effect)? If so, that would support your argument that we had an agreement and you cannot now change the terms of the agreement. Lisa A. Macklin, J.D. Coordinator, Intellectual Property Rights Office of Emory University Libraries Robert W. Woodruff Library Atlanta, GA 30322-2870 Email and IM: lisa.macklin@emory.edu
- Prev by Date: First Open Access Day to be held October 14, 2008
- Next by Date: RE: concepts of perpetuity
- Previous by thread: RE: concepts of perpetuity
- Next by thread: RE: concepts of perpetuity
- Index(es):