[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Copyediting. Why not in-house?
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Copyediting. Why not in-house?
- From: "Clydette Wantland" <cwantlan@uiuc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 18:24:29 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Heather, Copyeditors not only check spelling and grammar but the offer an expertise in the subject area as well as the style of the journal (APA, Chicago, etc.). This is best not left to students, unless they are a graduate level and plan to be around for a while. Undergrads tend to be over committed with classes, activities, socialization, and don't usually pan out. Picking a copyeditor from a freelance site will cost you much more than working with a publisher or developing your own "pool" of competent independent contractors. Ideally, you want a copyeditor who will work on the same journal for many years to develop that intimate knowledge of the style and quirks. This can be done with a freelancer just as well as an in-house staff person. I would suggest that set your "per issue rate" rather than pay per page off a freelance site. This would be based upon number of pages per issue and number of issues per year. Clydette Wantland Journals Manager University of Illinois Press Champaign, IL 61820 cwantlan@uillinois.edu Celebrating 90 years of publishing excellence
- Prev by Date: RE: Copyediting. Why not in-house?
- Next by Date: License question - UN Convention on Contracts
- Previous by thread: RE: Copyediting. Why not in-house?
- Next by thread: Re: Copyediting. Why not in-house?
- Index(es):