[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: European Research Council Mandate Green OA Self-Archiving
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: European Research Council Mandate Green OA Self-Archiving
- From: Stevan Harnad <harnad@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:09:18 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
No, neither the ERC Green OA Self-Archiving Mandate nor the NIH Green OA Self-Archiving Mandate applies to books. (Nor do the RCUK mandates, nor the university and departmental mandates, nor any of the 35 mandates adopted and the 8 proposed worldwide so far: http:// www.eprints.org/signup/fulllist.php.) They all apply only to peer- reviewed journal-articles.
Book self-archiving cannot and should not be mandated, for the contrary of much the same reasons peer-reviewed journal articles can and should be.
Stevan Harnad
On 16-Jan-08, at 7:20 PM, Sandy Thatcher wrote:
Does this apply to all "publications," including books? If so, one wonders how authors of these books will find any publishers for them. I certainly wouldn't invest our press's money in publishing a book that became available for free after six months from another source. And I would worry a great deal if agencies like the NEH made this a condition for all projects it funds in the humanities, both books and journals. A six-month embargo might work for science; I think it will destroy publishing in the humanities.
Sandy Thatcher
Penn State University Press
As a historic matter: The European Research Council finalised its Green OA Self-Archiving Mandate (and it did so 19 days before the NIH mandate!): The ERC requires that all peer-reviewed publications from ERC-funded research projects be deposited on publication into an appropriate research repository where available, such as PubMed Central, ArXiv or an institutional repository, and subsequently made Open Access within 6 months of publication." http://erc.europa.eu/pdf/ ScC_Guidelines_Open_Access_revised_Dec07_FINAL.pdf http://www.eprints.org/openaccess/policysignup/ Like the NIH mandate, the ERC mandate is also an immediate-deposit mandate, with the allowable embargo applying only to the date that the deposit is made OA, not to the date it is deposited (which must be immediately upon publication). The ERC embargo is also shorter (6 months, whereas NIH is 12 months). Better still, the deposit may be either institutional or central. The only way to improve on this nigh-optimal mandate is to require that the deposit be institutional ("Deposit Institutionally, Harvest Centrally") except if the grant recipient's institution does not yet have an institutional repository (in which case deposit should be in an interim generic repository such as the UK's DEPOT or Europe's EurOpenScholar). Bravo to both the US and Europe. Now it is time for the other US and EC funding agencies -- and, even more importantly, all the US and European universities -- to follow suit with Green OA Self-Archiving Mandates of their own. Stevan Harnad
- Prev by Date: Position Announcement - Welch Medical Library, Johns Hopkins U
- Next by Date: Re: European Research Council Mandate Green OA Self-Archiving
- Previous by thread: Re: European Research Council Mandate Green OA Self-Archiving
- Next by thread: Re: European Research Council Mandate Green OA Self-Archiving
- Index(es):