[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Obsolete legal concepts? (RE: Fair-Use/Schmair-Use...)
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Obsolete legal concepts? (RE: Fair-Use/Schmair-Use...)
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 15:09:47 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> No, Sandy, in science I would not; but in the case of these > legal terms and concepts -- applied to a new medium that > lawyers neither understand, nor one to which their obsolescent > terms and concepts are even coherently applicable -- it is the > "technical terms" that are the confused ones, and what is > needed is some common sense in their stead, to dispel the > confusion they create in the public mind. Stevan, could you give us, say, five examples of legal terms and concepts that are currently being used in this debate, and whose meanings are obsolete or otherwise inapplicable in the new medium? --- Rick Anderson Dir. of Resource Acquisition University of Nevada, Reno Libraries rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: Re: Fair-Use/Schmair-Use...
- Next by Date: Oxford Journals open access pricing adjustments
- Previous by thread: Elsevier to divest MDL
- Next by thread: Re: Obsolete legal concepts? (RE: Fair-Use/Schmair-Use...)
- Index(es):