[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Correction (RE: Thatcher vs. Harnad)
- To: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>, <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Correction (RE: Thatcher vs. Harnad)
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 20:53:13 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
To correct myself: > It's also important to recognize that OA has not simply > "happened." Some kinds of OA are happening (with results > both good and bad), but mandates, for example, have not > happened (yet). What I should have said was that the most potentially destructive kinds of legal mandates have not happened in a truly widespread way, yet. There are, of course, some OA mandates in place, though many (most?) of them are more like "requests" than mandates and many of them provide for reasonable embargo periods. --- Rick Anderson Dir. of Resource Acquisition University of Nevada, Reno Libraries (775) 682-5664 rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: Thatcher vs. Harnad
- Next by Date: Chicago Journals win top 2006 impact factor rankings
- Previous by thread: Publish-or-Perish Mandates and Self-Archiving Mandates
- Next by thread: Re: Correction (RE: Thatcher vs. Harnad)
- Index(es):