[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Thatcher vs. Harnad
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Thatcher vs. Harnad
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 20:48:01 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> As I have > remarked before on this list (though I misspelled it), open > access is a fait accompli. Arguments in favor of it, however > false, misleading, or intellectually dishonest, carry the day > with the proven strategy of saying the same thing over and over > in a louder and louder voice. I think it's important to acknowledge that arguments in favor of OA are not necessarily false, misleading, or intellectually dishonest. Some are, and we've seen our share of those on this list. But it would be just as wrongheaded to present OA as an unalloyed evil as it is to present it as a simple, self-evident good. The facts are that (pax Harnad) multiple models of OA really do exist, and (pax Harnad) what Harnad is promoting is one particular model, and different OA models offer different balances of cost and benefit. If we let ourselves think of OA as a monolithic concept that is Simply Bad, then all we're doing is promoting a mirror image of the Harnadian evangelism, and I'm not sure that's an approach that will lead to sound policy or practice. > OA may be a huge policy error, but it has happened, and we > would compound the error if we did not attempt to clean our > nest now that it has been fouled. It's also important to recognize that OA has not simply "happened." Some kinds of OA are happening (with results both good and bad), but mandates, for example, have not happened (yet). I'm convinced that it's important to fight against legal mandates in most cases, and it's much too soon to roll over and accept them as inevitable. If the nest is foul, let's focus on the specific ways in which it's been fouled and work on cleaning it up -- but that important work shouldn't keep us from continuing to try to influence the ongoing policy debate. Trying not to sound too earnest and wide-eyed here, but it sounds like Joe needs a pep talk... :-) --- Rick Anderson Dir. of Resource Acquisition University of Nevada, Reno Libraries (775) 682-5664 rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: Publish-or-Perish Mandates and Self-Archiving Mandates
- Next by Date: Correction (RE: Thatcher vs. Harnad)
- Previous by thread: Thatcher vs. Harnad
- Next by thread: ONIX for Serials Coverage statement/SOH 1.1 now
- Index(es):