[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: News Release: Project Transfer
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: News Release: Project Transfer
- From: "Ian Russell" <ian.russell@cytherean.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 21:25:07 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Possibly true. But often journals that are transferred are losing money and increasing the subscription price is necessary in order for them to become profitable - there are plenty of occasions where the alternative to the transfer of a journal and a subsequent hike in price has been closure of the title. At least if the journal is transferred the market has a choice which it wouldn't have if the journal went out of business. Ian Russell ALPSP > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu [mailto:owner-liblicense- > l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Joseph J. Esposito > Sent: 10 May 2007 22:39 > To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu > Subject: Re: News Release: Project Transfer > > The proposed Code of Practice appears to be a good idea. It may > have some unintended consequences, however, which participants in > scholarly communications may wish to consider. > > The Code is for "Journals Transferring Between Publishers." You > may well ask why journals transfer. There are many reasons, but > to name just a few: money, access to technology, new managment, > and marketing. While there are exceptions, transfers typically > occur from small publishers to larger ones (which may themselves > be not-for-profit) and often from not-for-profit publishers to > commercial organizations. > > Members of this list may wish to confirm or challenge my > hypothesis that journals that transfer are more likely to have > above-average price increases than journals that do not transfer. > > Thus the Code, which facilitates transfer, is likely to result in > a smooth transfer AND higher prices. Is the Code a good idea? > Yes. Are higher prices a good idea? It depends on whether you > are buying or selling. > > Joe Esposito > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Acreman, Beverley" <Beverley.Acreman@tandf.co.uk> > To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> > Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2007 8:50 AM > Subject: News Release: Project Transfer > > >> UKSG Working Group "Project Transfer" invites Publishers to >> sign-up to an agreed Code of Practice to Improve Procedures for >> Journals Transferring Between Publishers >> >> Oxford, UK - 9th May 2007- Project Transfer is inviting >> publishers to sign up to a Code of Practice which aims to improve >> the procedures and policies surrounding the transfer of journals >> between publishers. The Code has been drafted with extensive help >> from many of the major international publishing houses and has >> already been applauded as an excellent step forward by the >> contributing library community. >> >> The Code outlines a set of guidelines for both the Transferring >> and the Receiving publisher in any journal transfer. >> Comprehensive in its detail, the Code covers the thorny issues of >> ongoing access provision to online content, exchange of >> subscriber lists, DOI and URL transfer as well as the division >> and definition of born-digital versus newly digitized backfile >> content. >> >> The Project Transfer Working Group is inviting publishers to sign >> up to this Code through the Project website: >> <http://www.projecttransfer.org/> where the Code of Practice can >> also be found. Full details of the Code were launched at the UKSG >> Annual Conference in Warwick (16-18 April 2007). >> >> More information is available on the UKSG website: www.uksg.org/transfer >> >> Bev Acreman >> pp UKSG >>
- Prev by Date: AVS Journal, Biointerphases, Now Available in an Annual Print Volume
- Next by Date: Sage becomes Transfer Compliant
- Previous by thread: Re: News Release: Project Transfer
- Next by thread: RE: News Release: Project Transfer
- Index(es):