[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Forrester Research license negotiations
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>, <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: Forrester Research license negotiations
- From: "Seeman, Corey" <cseeman@bus.umich.edu>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 18:25:20 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Christine -- This is a tricky situation that I have heard with this vendor and another institution. At the Kresge Library, we have access to this product just for the students, staff, and faculty of the Ross School of Business. We are an independent library here at Michigan providing the resource needs of the Business School faculty staff and students. So this is not something that the whole University population has access to. In reviewing the agree/disagree screen that our community members need to fill out on our site, I can see that we need to make some changes (including governance) to bring the contracts up to current standards. But there is nothing specifically stated insofar as the rights of the different groups. There are launching points for two different types of records (when the patron creates the account). We have one for students and one for faculty. Staff are going to use the faculty one and I see no issue with that and there appears to be nothing in our contract to prevent this. There have been some vendors who have asked that our product be limited to certain populations of our users (no undergrads, no PhDs, etc.), but I let them know that it is not an option for us. While I am sure that it is possible, I do not want to establish different classes of users. Our undergrads will not use some of our heavy databases, but we should not restrict them from doing so. The case I think we can make for staff might be that many staff do research for the faculty. People who are in faculty support roles will often download articles and reports for the faculty member they are working with. I have often held that the vendor has the right to ask for anything they want and we, as the libraries, have the right to walk away. I have heard of a few instances lately where vendors have been digging their heals in on issues that appear to be minor (at least from my vantage point). These do not involve my library, but I am trying to come up with ways to get to yes (and so far have drawn a blank). That is not to say that I am happy with all my contracts, but I suppose it is being happy enough. Maybe the thing to do is to walk away. Let the vendor know that if they insist on this, you will have to find another resource to provide this information (maybe, eMarketer, Gartner, Frost and Sullivan, etc.) Another thing to do is to go back and say that the price reflects the full population...once you take these people out, the value to the school is less and you will expect a reduction in price. This is not ideal, but it might be a good first step. We primarily represent the Ross Community (Business School at Michigan) and then the University as a whole. In that regard, we do not want to enter an agreement where the vendor limits who can use the resource within this universe. Hope some of this is useful. Best -- Corey Corey Seeman Director Kresge Business Administration Library Ross School of Business The University of Michigan cseeman@umich.edu Kresge Library Home Page: <http://www.bus.umich.edu/kresgelibrary/> My home page: <http://www-personal.umich.edu/~cseeman/index.html> ________________________________ From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu on behalf of Christine Turner Sent: Thu 3/22/2007 6:17 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Forrester Research license negotiations Hello - I have been negotiating over the past couple of months with Forrester Research <http://www.forrester.com/> on their license for our access to their database of research reports. Our current sticking point is their intent to restrict accounts to UMass Amherst faculty, students and librarians only, thus excluding staff and administrators. We have agreed that those with UMass Amherst domain email accounts will be able to register for Forrester accounts. They have asked us to further parse our email accounts into categories of community status in order to deny accounts to university staff. This prospect we find objectionable on the basis of both practicality and principle. Do you know of any academic libraries that have negotiated with Forrester a license which includes all community members as acceptable users? Do you have any advice about license negotiations with Forrester? Thanks for your consideration and input. Best, Christine N. Turner Electronic Resources Librarian Acquisitions Department/W.E.B. Du Bois Library University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA 01003 E-mail cturner@library.umass.edu Web http://people.umass.edu/cturner
- Prev by Date: RE: Summary paper from the Publishing Research Consortium
- Next by Date: RE: Clarification on SERU proposal
- Previous by thread: Forrester Research license negotiations
- Next by thread: AIP Releases Enhanced Backfiles
- Index(es):