[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: the Yale argument on open-choice
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: the Yale argument on open-choice
- From: "Rick Anderson" <rickand@unr.edu>
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:34:53 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
> For all the many problems of the traditional model of user-pays > publishing, it does one thing very well: it marries the > production of information to the ability to consume it. In > plain English, this is called living within a budget. I'm not even convinced that there are many problems with the traditional model of user-pays publishing. The model itself works great, as Joe points out. The problem is with price inflation. If all journal subscriptions cost $5 per year, no one would be complaining about the subscription model. Rick Anderson Dir. of Resource Acquisition University of Nevada, Reno Libraries rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: RE: Summary paper from the Publishing Research Consortium
- Next by Date: Re: Why Cornell's Institutional Repository Is Near-Empty
- Previous by thread: RE: the Yale argument on open-choice
- Next by thread: Re: the Yale argument on open-choice
- Index(es):