[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why Cornell's Institutional Repository Is Near-Empty
- To: <pmd8@cornell.edu>, <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Why Cornell's Institutional Repository Is Near-Empty
- From: "Michael Carroll" <Carroll@law.villanova.edu>
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:04:14 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Two suggestions: (1) A reminder that the "Patchwork Mandate" is a reasonable, incremental response for open access advocates at a sprawling institution like Cornell. See http://eprints.utas.edu.au/410/; see also http://carrollogos.blogspot.com/2006/11/open-access-and-incremenatlism.html (2) At least on American campuses, faculty are much more likely to support a mandate if they vote to impose it upon themselves rather than have it imposed by an administrator. Look for a faculty champion who would be willing to take on this cause. Best, Michael W. Carroll Associate Professor of Law Villanova University School of Law Villanova, PA 19085 blog: http://www.carrollogos.org/ Research papers: http://ssrn.com/author=330326 http://law.bepress.com/villanovalwps/
- Prev by Date: RE: NISO Shared E-Resource Understanding (SERU) Releases Draft Recommended Practices
- Next by Date: First ALCTS Outstanding Collaboration Citation Awarded to CLOCKSS
- Previous by thread: RE: Why Cornell's Institutional Repository Is Near-Empty
- Next by thread: Re: Why Cornell's Institutional Repository Is Near-Empty
- Index(es):