[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: D-Lib article about Cornell's Institutional Repository
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: D-Lib article about Cornell's Institutional Repository
- From: "Greg Tananbaum" <gtananbaum@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 20:24:07 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
This is a very interesting study with nuggets for both poles to trumpet. What I find salient is the belief of those interviewed that personal, departmental, and lab web pages (not to mention subject repositories) provide an adequate forum for the dissemination of a researcher's work. The intelligent IR implementation will recognize that established pathways exist, and that faculty are loathe to disrupt or duplicate them. If libraries value enhanced scholarly communication as a high priority (a perspective not generally shared by their faculty, according to this survey), then they must do more of the heavy lifting to facilitate it. This means lowering or eliminating the already low barriers to repository participation, integrating with existing dissemination mechanisms, and investing in more cross-walking and less cross-talking. Best, Greg Greg Tananbaum gtananbaum@gmail.com (510) 295-7504
- Prev by Date: Re: D-Lib article about Cornell's Institutional Repository
- Next by Date: RE: AAUP Statement on Open Access
- Previous by thread: Re: D-Lib article about Cornell's Institutional Repository
- Next by thread: Re: D-Lib article about Cornell's Institutional Repository
- Index(es):