[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: D-Lib article about Cornell's Institutional Repository
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: D-Lib article about Cornell's Institutional Repository
- From: Thomas Krichel <krichel@openlib.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 20:22:27 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Ann Okerson writes > Results: Cornell's DSpace is largely underpopulated and > underused by its faculty. Many of its collections are empty, > and most collections contain few items. As I heard some clever chap say at a meeting some time ago, the idea of an institutional respository is as attractive as the idea of a station toilet. > Each discipline has a normative culture, largely defined by > their reward system and traditions. That's what I have been saying for ten years now. > If the goal of institutional repositories is to capture and > preserve the scholarship of one's faculty, institutional > repositories will need to address this cultural diversity. Repositories that are integrated into discipline aggregators do work. Cheers, Thomas Krichel mailto:krichel@openlib.org http://openlib.org/home/krichel RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel skype id: thomaskrichel
- Prev by Date: 7th Annual Copyright Symposium, May 21-23, 2007
- Next by Date: Re: D-Lib article about Cornell's Institutional Repository
- Previous by thread: D-Lib article about Cornell's Institutional Repository
- Next by thread: Re: D-Lib article about Cornell's Institutional Repository
- Index(es):