[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Call for papers, reviewers and Editorial-Advisory Board members
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: Re: Call for papers, reviewers and Editorial-Advisory Board members
- From: Carol Hutchins <carol.hutchins@nyu.edu>
- Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 19:19:47 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Margaret, Yes, faculty ask from time to time when they receive invitations to boards of outfits they've never heard of.
I'll repeat here what I noted on PAMnet about this one a couple of weeks ago: one of the "resources" links is to Midlife Dating Network.
Carol Hutchins, NYU
Margaret Landesman wrote:
Do others of you have faculty reporting ads like this? From this and other sources? It's touching to see an "overriding passion" to assist academics, but could it also be phrased, "Since faculty author, review, and edit for free, why not see if they'll do it for us?" Margaret Landesman UtahCall for papers, reviewers and Editorial-Advisory Board members Every researcher, writer or artist deserves a fair consideration to be published. Scientific Journals International (SJI) provides an efficient forum for publishing research and creative work from all disciplines. SJI has assembled an extensive and prestigious Editorial and Advisory Board (www.scientificjournals.org/editorial_board.htm). This initiative is driven by an overriding passion to assist researchers, writers and artists to cope with the "publish or perish" reality that has been created by the policies of the academia and funding agencies. According to several surveys, a large majority of authors and researchers cite slow review process and publication delays in the current system as a major obstacle to their publishing objectives. Many have also expressed concerns about the fairness and integrity of the peer review process in traditional scholarly publishing. Some scholars have argued that there is a need to liberate the publication process for broader and fairer access. Scientific Journals International (SJI) is the first global initiative that intends to accomplish this objective. We sincerely believe that researchers, writers and artists who have devoted months or years to a research/creative project, should not be shut out of the publication world simply because they did not follow some procedural or stylistic rules and guidelines or because their work did not fit in. All traditional journals have very rigid stylistic or procedural policies that unduly create artificial barriers and in effect retard innovation and creativity. Scientific Journals International (SJI) maintains minimal procedural and stylistic rules, and accepts papers that follow any style manual such as APA, MLA, Chicago, etc. A fair peer-reviewed evaluation system is used to select papers for publication. SJI maintains a rapid electronic submission, review and publication process. Additionally, we do not set the same limitations on the length of the article as other traditional and online journals do. Our capability for perpetual future accessibility and preservation is also extremely valuable to both authors and readers. Our manuscript submission guidelines can be found at http://www.scientificjournals.org/submission.htm. Application form for Reviewers and Editorial Advisory Board can be found at http://www.scientificjournals.org/wanted.htm. Current issues can be found at http://www.scientificjournals.org/current_issue.htm. Sincerely, Neil A. Anderson Scientific Journals International (SJI) http://www.scientificjournals.org or http://www.gcchq.com/SJI
- Prev by Date: Re: Open Choice is a Trojan Horse for Open Access Mandates
- Next by Date: Re: Open access and publishing software
- Previous by thread: Re: FW: Call for papers, reviewers and Editorial-Advisory Board members
- Next by thread: FW: UKSG Conference Workshop on Customer Service Excellence
- Index(es):