[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: puzzled by self-archiving thread
- To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: RE: puzzled by self-archiving thread
- From: "Martin Frank" <MFrank@The-APS.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 21:50:06 EST
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Margaret, I am curious what you mean about partnering with publishers. I have always viewed society journals as part of the academy because of our relationship with the faculty as authors, editors and reviewers. It is for that reason that most society journals are bargains when assessed on cost per page, cost per citation, etc. It has been the commercial journals that have apparently not been good partners with institutions. Creating bundles has increased content for the libraries, but not necessarily content that is of the most favorable cost per use, citation, or page. The bundles suck money out of the library coffers, diminishing their ability to be good partners with society publishers who have sought to hold costs down to institutions. Instead we hear that we are short of money and can no longer subscribe to your journal. As journal content is increasingly available in repositories, either university or government repositories, it will become easier to cancel subscriptions. Will it happen? That is the great unknown. I wish I knew what the answer was. If I did, I would have a better idea how to guide our publication program. Martin Frank, Ph.D. Executive Director, American Physiological Society 9650 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20814-3991 Tel: 301-634-7118 fax: 301-634-7241 email: mfrank@the-aps.org APS Website: http://www.the-aps.org ...integrating the life sciences from molecule to organism ________________________________ From: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu on behalf of Joseph J. Esposito Sent: Mon 12/18/2006 7:00 PM To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu Subject: Re: puzzled by self-archiving thread Margaret, I believe, as David Prosser has asserted, that the hard evidence that OA results in cancellations does not exist. Publishers worry about this as something that could have an impact on them in the future, a point that Stevan Harnad apparently acknowledges. There is, however, the question of what it means to cancel subscriptions based on "use." Does the use of articles in repositories, on authors' Web sites, and elsewhere undermine the "count" for the official usage statistics? Perhaps. Or, perhaps not yet. In any event, I believe your closing comment ("I would wish this list might talk about ways libraries can partner with such publishers to find ways to change this situation") is right on target. Joe Esposito ----- Original Message ----- From: "Margaret Landesman" <margaret.landesman@utah.edu> To: <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu> Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 2:03 PM Subject: puzzled by self-archiving thread > Re: posts about self-archiving causing cancellations > > Busy as I am each year cancelling serials and cutting the book > budget, I have not read these complete postings, nor have I > done studies or read most of these studies. > > But I am puzzled. > > As we cancel journals, we rely on reports which show the number > of uses, the costs, and the costs per use. We have no reports > which show the journal's stance on IRs or whether it is OA > after an embargo. Do other libraries have such a thing? We do > not have this information in our ILS and it would be a very big > job to put it there. > > If we know that the journal has a liberal stance, we exempt it > from cancellation if possible - and we have done that with > MUSE, BioOne, university press, etc journals in order to > support those publishers. > > We are cancelling journals - both print and electronic - as fast > as we can, generally on the grounds that they are: > > 1) high cost-peruse, or > 2) not used > > We expect to go on doing this, probably forever. > > What has made me especially sad this year is that, very > reluctantly, we have cancelled packages from university presses > and smaller publishers because, after we have had them up for a > number of years, they are showing no use. > > I would wish this list might talk about ways libraries can > partner with such publishers to find ways to change this > situation... > > Margaret Landesman > University of Utah
- Prev by Date: Hindawi's OA journal collection expands
- Next by Date: INGRAM INDUSTRIES INC.NEWS RELEASE
- Previous by thread: RE: puzzled by self-archiving thread
- Next by thread: RE: puzzled by self-archiving thread
- Index(es):