[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Confidentiality clause is back in at Nature
- To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Subject: RE: Confidentiality clause is back in at Nature
- From: David Goodman <dgoodman@Princeton.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 17:47:53 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
I'm going to put this a little more bluntly: A confidentiality clause either means 1. the vendor is trying to put one over on you, (by which I mean charging you a price higher than would be tenable in an open market) or 2. He wants you to think he's done that with the other customers, but is giving you a bargain. These clauses may prevent Rick and I from telling which is the case, but they also prevent the vendor from proving that they are making a fair offer. It is a trap of their own making: if they act like proverbial confidence men, they may convince us, and the net result is that no alert customer will believe anything they may say about pricing. There is a business advantage in being known for honest and open dealing. David Goodman, Ph.D., M.L.S. dgoodman@princeton.edu ----- Original Message ----- From: Rick Anderson <rickand@unr.edu> Date: Tuesday, October 3, 2006 1:17 am Subject: RE: Confidentiality clause is back in at Nature To: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu >> Strongly disagree with Rick's premise. Using his examples >> >> 1. Automotive- Not relevant. It's not what you telling me what >> you paid for the car. It's whether the dealer will tell you >> what he sold the identical car for, to the last customer. Try >> to get that number. > > The context of this discussion is confidentiality clauses. No > automotive dealer (that I'm aware of, anyway) will ever make you > sign a confidentiality agreement, forbidding you to discuss what > you paid for the car he sold you. I may not have much luck > getting _him_ to tell me what you paid, but there's nothing to > stop _you_ from telling me what you paid. > >> 2 Bookselling. Not at all easy to know. Yes easy to get the >> list price. But most publishers' discount schedules, to >> libraries, to consumers, to consortia, for multi-copy sales, >> vary all over the place. > > Again, you're right that the prices vary. But it's very easy to > find out what any particular library's or consortium's discount > structure is -- all you have to do is call up the librarian and > ask. (Unless they've agreed to a confidentiality clause.) > > My response to each of your other examples is the same: in none > of the industries or markets that I cited is it common for > pricing to be kept contractually confidential. In many of them, > at least the list price for the product is easily and publicly > available -- special deals may have taken place in particular > instances, but they're rarely (if ever) protecting by vows of > silence. > > ---- > Rick Anderson > Dir. of Resource Acquisition > University of Nevada, Reno Libraries > rickand@unr.edu
- Prev by Date: Re: Confidentiality clause is back in at Nature
- Next by Date: Summary of Responses to Licensing Negotiation Query
- Previous by thread: Re: Confidentiality clause is back in at Nature
- Next by thread: RE: Confidentiality clause is back in at Nature
- Index(es):