[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Heads up: Nature license and confidentiality
- To: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: Heads up: Nature license and confidentiality
- From: "Sally Morris \(Chief Executive\)" <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 20:38:31 EDT
- Reply-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Sender: email@example.com
I'm slightly suprised that librarians find anything odd in this. In the print world, the price was the price. In the digital world, as Peggy says herself, 'we don't all pay the price'; actual prices paid by individual consortia and even individual libraries tend to be the result of often protracted negotiation. Different factors may have a bearing in each case. So making public the price actually negotiated would be most unfair on the vendor, wouldn't it?
Sally Morris, Chief Executive
Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peggy Cooper" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 6:16 AM
Subject: Re: Heads up: Nature license and confidentiality
I normally just lurk around on the list but this issue is important enough in my opinion that I wanted to share my 2 cents. "It seems to me that we'd better all decide that we're not going to agree." - I hope so! As a representative for a public institution, I can not be a part of any "secret" deals and I don't & won't. I'm curious about the reasons that the vendors want their pricing kept secret. We already know that we don't all pay the price, so what are they protecting?
Peggy S. Cooper
Coordinator of Collection Development
Boise State University
Boise, ID 83725-1430
Nature recently announced (http://www.nature.com/press_releases/NPG_opens_archives.pdf) a sort of modified open access to its archival content. However, there's a catch: they're now asking us to sign a new version of the license agreement for our 2007 renewals, in order (as my new sales rep put it) "to guarantee that you have access if you need to cancel.""Rick Anderson" <email@example.com> 8/23/2006 5:24 PM >>>
Most of the new license language is okay, but they now apparently want confidentiality for pricing and license terms. If we agree, that could spell the end of public discussion of Nature's pricing practices. It seems to me that we'd better all decide that we're not going to agree.
Dir. of Resource Acquisition
University of Nevada, Reno Libraries
- Prev by Date: Announcement: Oxford Journals launch Chinese Journal of International Politics
- Next by Date: RE: Question for some librarians......
- Previous by thread: Re: Heads up: Nature license and confidentiality
- Next by thread: Re: Heads up: Nature license and confidentiality