[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Maximising research access vs. minimizing copy-editing errors
- To: "Liblicense" <liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: Maximising research access vs. minimizing copy-editing errors
- From: "Sally Morris \(ALPSP\)" <sally.morris@alpsp.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 19:54:01 EDT
- Reply-to: liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
- Sender: owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu
Apologies for copying the wrong link. You will find the BMJ data at http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/aboutsite/visitorstats.shtml - look at the 'Annual Online Questionnaire'
Sally Morris, Chief Executive
Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers
South House, The Street, Clapham, Worthing, West Sussex BN13 3UU, UK
Email: sally.morris@alpsp.org
[mailto:owner-liblicense-l@lists.yale.edu] On Behalf Of Sally Morris
(ALPSP)
Sent: 28 July 2006 00:36
To: Liblicense
Subject: Re: Maximising research access vs. minimizing copy-editing errors
Maybe we need more information about the actual size of the access problem. Publishers tend, I think, to report fairly low levels of 'turnaways' - those who try to access full text but can't. If any publishers reading this can contribute figures, that would be useful.
A very, very small percentage of accesses to BMJ's free research articles are from patients and the general public; see http://miranda.ingentaconnect.com/vl=6377737/cl=15/tt=885/ini=alpsp/nw=1/fm= docpdf/rpsv/cw/alpsp/09531513/v16n3/s1/p163.
In OUP's recent study of NAR (http://www.oxfordjournals.org/news/oa_report.pdf) only eight to twelve percent of increased access was attributable to its going OA; far, far more was due to opening up to search engine crawlers.
Sally Morris, Chief Executive
Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers
Email: sally.morris@alpsp.org
- Prev by Date: Provosts' letter in support of FRPAA
- Previous by thread: RE: Maximising research access vs. minimizing copy-editing errors
- Next by thread: [no subject]
- Index(es):